IBM odpovedela docela rychleHere's what Ellison got wrong yesterday, according to Sibley:1. Oracle's benchmark tests were made against three-to-five-year-old IBM servers, not more recent models.2. Oracle sometimes stacked the deck in its tests, using servers with up to twice as many CPU cores—hence more raw processing power—than the IBM systems it used.3. Oracle's price claims were just plain wild, Sibley says. In one of Ellison's slides, he claimed that an Oracle $270,000 T58 was faster than a $1.9 million IBM P780. Those were not comparable setups, Sibley says. For similarly configured machines, IBM servers are priced about the same as Oracle's new servers, he says.Plus, IBM's servers help save enterprises money on software licenses, he says. That's because IBM servers will run more apps on a single server, he says. For enterprise software that's priced per server, companies can pay less for software licenses.Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/ibm-oracle-ceo-2013-3...
Názor byl 1× upraven, naposled 29. 03. 2013 16:59
